-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
Doc maintain #34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Doc maintain #34
Conversation
|
Hi @LeoSchmider , thanks again for fixing the bugs! For Regarding the dynamic viscosity, I think it's a good idea to make the distinction! Maybe it would also make sense to add the alias |
|
Okay, I will keep the |
|
Yeah, Reynolds number might not be very advantageous, you're right.. But Prandtl and Schmidt numbers would be good fits at least! |
|
I think you can merge this PR, for new functions implementation it might be better that it has his own PR. |
|
Ah, I saw you changed nearly all appearances of
Sorry for this misunderstanding! Hope this is not much extra work for you |
|
No no don't worry, you made your point cristal clear the first time but because I'm kind of a newbie with julia my thought process on this was that I was not sure on how to implement the alias without breaking all the tests and all the models. So my idea was given the fact that everything was going to be broken somehow I told myself it might be worth it changing all the instancies of |
Updates functions documentation, update unit display. Refactor
viscositytodynamic viscosityat least for function docs and descriptions, because ultimately giving user the possibility to make kinematic viscosity calculation is pretty cool and having molar density and molar mass already calculated should easy the implementation. Final goal of this is to implement Prandlt's number calculation because for transport phenomena study this is a cool metric to use correlations.