operations: draft for export control classification #1102
Conversation
|
I marked this pull request again as draft since there is still a discussion happening in the Operations workgroup on how to best represent the data. |
| ## Metadata | ||
|
|
||
| - name: ExportControlClassificationAssessment | ||
| - SubclassOf: /Core/Element |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| - SubclassOf: /Core/Element | |
| - SubclassOf: /Core/Action |
|
|
||
| ## Description | ||
|
|
||
| Weight to express relevance in de minimis consideration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Operations meeting 25-09-26: A better description is needed to clarify use and context.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Definition of the weight (e.g. specification, type,...) should be in the Assessment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
needs to be consistent for all classifications in one assessmentResult.
model/Operations/Classes/ExportControlClassificationAssessment.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
rebase to current 'develop' state planned before merge |
umm0
force-pushed
the
operations-export-classification
branch
2 times, most recently
from
46ada0f to
c721835
Compare
umm0
force-pushed
the
profile-operations
branch
from
ed12e58 to
8094d37
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
Co-authored-by: stevenc-stb <steven@smarttalkbeacon.com> Signed-off-by: umm0 <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
Co-authored-by: stevenc-stb <steven@smarttalkbeacon.com> Signed-off-by: umm0 <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
umm0
force-pushed
the
operations-export-classification
branch
from
c721835 to
dce63a2
Compare
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
…implementations Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
|
I rebased the profile operations branch and the source for this pull request onto 'develop'. I suggest merging the pull request as it is now to have the profile-operations branch updated to the current discussion state. Your opinion? Edit:I added the suggestions from the discussion here to a separate branch so they are kept: https://github.com/umm0/spdx-3-model/pull/1/files Best, |
Signed-off-by: Ummo Schwarting <uschwarting@deloitte.de>
3 participants
Draft pull request to discuss export control classification