Skip to content

fix: handle nullable api key #3774

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 30, 2025
Merged

fix: handle nullable api key #3774

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 30, 2025

Conversation

kiwicopple
Copy link
Member

This PR was automatically created to sync API types from the infrastructure repository.

Changes were detected in the generated API code after syncing with the latest spec from infrastructure.

@sweatybridge sweatybridge changed the title chore: sync API types from infrastructure fix: sync API types from infrastructure Jun 30, 2025
@sweatybridge sweatybridge changed the title fix: sync API types from infrastructure fix: handle nullable api key Jun 30, 2025
@sweatybridge sweatybridge disabled auto-merge June 30, 2025 04:54
@sweatybridge sweatybridge merged commit bd30875 into develop Jun 30, 2025
13 checks passed
@sweatybridge sweatybridge deleted the sync/api-types branch June 30, 2025 04:54
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 15964135289

Warning: This coverage report may be inaccurate.

This pull request's base commit is no longer the HEAD commit of its target branch. This means it includes changes from outside the original pull request, including, potentially, unrelated coverage changes.

Details

  • 20 of 20 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 3 files are covered.
  • 5 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.06%) to 55.609%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
internal/gen/keys/keys.go 5 12.9%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 15905703026: 0.06%
Covered Lines: 6077
Relevant Lines: 10928

💛 - Coveralls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants