Fix lint errors #6944
Draft
Fix lint errors #6944
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
smokestacklightnin
force-pushed
the
ci/linting/fix-lint-errors
branch
from
b43e55c to
ecf3409
Compare
smokestacklightnin
force-pushed
the
ci/linting/fix-lint-errors
branch
from
8e1fd34 to
bf43171
Compare
For remaining B008 violations, see [Issue 6945](tensorflow#6945)
smokestacklightnin
force-pushed
the
ci/linting/fix-lint-errors
branch
from
bf43171 to
bb24e15
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The current linting workflow checks only for linting errors on a per pull request basis, rather than the entire repo. That is for a given pull request, the linting workflow only checks the files changed in that workflow. This is because there are many linting errors.
This pull request is a first effort fixing linting errors that predate the linting workflow.
Changes include:
Footnotes
See Code inistantiates abstract base classes #6942, Abstract base classes have incorrectly decorated methods #6943, and Fixing Ruff
function-call-in-default-argument (B008)causes test collection errors #6945 for remaining bugbear violations ↩