Skip to content

Conversation

atovpeko
Copy link
Contributor

@atovpeko atovpeko commented Oct 5, 2025

This is a feature comparison docs between cloud and timescaleDB based on input from Nicole.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 5, 2025

Allow 10 minutes from last push for the staging site to build. If the link doesn't work, try using incognito mode instead. For internal reviewers, check web-documentation repo actions for staging build status. Link to build for this PR: http://docs-dev.timescale.com/docs-353-add-a-feature-comparison-to-the-about-section

@atovpeko
Copy link
Contributor Author

atovpeko commented Oct 5, 2025

Doc to review: https://docs-dev.timescale.com/docs-353-add-a-feature-comparison-to-the-about-section/about/353-add-a-feature-comparison-to-the-about-section/feature-comparison/. The two cloud tabs will merge into just one cloud tab when there is feature parity

@atovpeko atovpeko added the azure label Oct 6, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@billy-the-fish billy-the-fish left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Love the page. Couple of nits.

| Feature | $CLOUD_LONG on AWS | $CLOUD_LONG on Azure | $TIMESCALE_DB |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| **Best-in-сlass $PG performance** | | | |
| Automatic partitioning via hypertables for efficient indexes and faster ingest | <span style="color:green">✓</span> Included | <span style="color:green">✓</span> Included | <span style="color:green">✓</span> Included |
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Don't need included or N/A. Just a ✅ or ❌ is enough.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants