Fix tests #1004
Fix tests #1004
Conversation
⏱️ 38m total CI duration on this PR
|
|
|
|
|
|
Several tests are failing in this PR. The failures include snapshot mismatches for prettier and kube-linter, an installation error for psscriptanalyzer, and a write EPIPE error during a tree-sitter test. Root Cause Analysis:
Resolution Plan:
|
|
The test failures are related to snapshot mismatches for prettier, psscriptanalyzer, kube-linter, and ruff, as well as a potential installation issue with psscriptanalyzer and a write EPIPE error during a tree-sitter test. Root Cause Analysis:
Resolution Plan:
|
|
Several tests are failing in this PR. The failures seem to be related to snapshot mismatches for prettier and kube-linter, psscriptanalyzer installation failing, and a broken pipe error during tree-sitter version check. Prettier snapshot mismatches: The tests "Testing formatter prettier test basic", "Testing linter prettier test basic", and "Testing linter prettier test error" are failing due to snapshot mismatches. This indicates that the output of prettier has changed, and the snapshots need to be updated. PSScriptAnalyzer installation failure: The tests "Testing linter psscriptanalyzer test check" and "Testing linter psscriptanalyzer test check_custom_settings" are failing because the PSScriptAnalyzer tool installation is failing with a 404 error. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the tool version being unavailable. Kube-linter snapshot mismatch: The test "Testing linter kube-linter test basic" is failing due to a snapshot mismatch. This indicates that the output of kube-linter has changed, and the snapshots need to be updated. Tree-sitter broken pipe error: The test "Testing tool tree-sitter tree-sitter --version" is failing with a broken pipe error. This could be due to a resource exhaustion issue or a problem with the tree-sitter installation. Here is a proposed resolution plan: Prettier snapshot updates: PSScriptAnalyzer installation failure: Kube-linter snapshot updates: Tree-sitter broken pipe error: |
|
Several tests are failing in this PR. The failures include snapshot mismatches in prettier, ruff, and kube-linter, PSScriptAnalyzer installation failure, and an EPIPE error during the tree-sitter version check. Please refer to the analysis above for detailed root cause and resolution plan. |
|
Tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a PSScriptAnalyzer installation error. Resolution Plan:
|
SummaryMultiple tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
|
|
The additional test failures further confirm the initial analysis. Summary: Root Cause Analysis:
Resolution Plan:
|
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install Root Cause Analysis
It's possible that the snapshot test failures are related to the Resolution Plan
Since the tests are failing due to external dependencies, it is possible that the issue is not related to the changes in the PR. The author should try re-running the tests to see if the issue persists. If the issue persists, the author should investigate the |
|
Summary: Root Cause Analysis:
Resolution Plan:
|
|
Summary: Root Cause Analysis:
Resolution Plan:
|
|
I was unable to find the trunk configuration file. To proceed, I need to know the location and name of the trunk configuration file to determine the version of psscriptanalyzer being used. Action for the user: Please provide the location and name of the trunk configuration file (e.g., |
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
Since I don't have enough information to fix the |
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install the hermetic tool Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
|
|
Summary: Root Cause Analysis: It's difficult to pinpoint the exact root cause without the test logs, but the changes suggest that the Resolution Plan:
If the above steps do not resolve the flakiness, please provide the test logs for further investigation. |
|
It appears the test logs are unavailable, and the file changes don't immediately suggest a cause for flakiness. To proceed, I need more information. Request to User: Please provide more information about which tests are considered flaky. Specifically:
With this information, I can use the tools to examine the relevant test files and their changes in the PR to identify potential causes of flakiness. |
|
I am unable to retrieve the file content for Here's what the user should do to investigate further:
|
|
I have retrieved the content of To proceed, I recommend the following:
If the issue persists after these steps, please provide the diff for |
|
It appears that the test logs are unavailable, and the file changes are limited to plugin configurations and test index. Without specific test failure information, it's challenging to pinpoint the root cause of the flakiness. To proceed effectively, I recommend the following:
If the flakiness persists, consider adding retry mechanisms or more robust synchronization to the affected tests. |
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install the hermetic tool Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
|
|
Break |
|
Based on the retrieved file contents and diffs:
Resolution Plan:
Here's the suggested fix: diff --git a/linters/prettier/plugin.yaml b/linters/prettier/plugin.yaml
index 719988a..45981c8 100644
--- a/linters/prettier/plugin.yaml
+++ b/linters/prettier/plugin.yaml
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ lint:
- name: prettier
files:
- typescript
- - yaml
+ - yaml
- css
- postcss
- sass
diff --git a/linters/psscriptanalyzer/plugin.yaml b/linters/psscriptanalyzer/plugin.yaml
index 2efc592..4a084a6 100644
--- a/linters/psscriptanalyzer/plugin.yaml
+++ b/linters/psscriptanalyzer/plugin.yaml
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ downloads:
linux: linux
windows: windows
macos: macos
- url: https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer/releases/download/${version}/PSScriptAnalyzer.${version}.nupkg
+ url: https://github.com/PowerShell/PSScriptAnalyzer/releases/download/v${version}/PSScriptAnalyzer.${version}.nupkg
- name: converttosarif
downloads:
- os:
diff --git a/tests/index.ts b/tests/index.ts
index 9284b91..9c9654a 100644
--- a/tests/index.ts
+++ b/tests/index.ts
@@ -695,12 +695,6 @@ export const linterCheckTest = ({
postCheck?: TestCallback;
manualVersionReplacer?: (version: string) => string;\
}) => {\
- if (linterName.startsWith("pretty")) {
- throw new Error("`linterCheckTest` is not supported for pretty linters");
- }\
- if (linterName.startsWith("bio")) {
- throw new Error("`linterCheckTest` is not supported for bio linters");
- }\
// Step 1a: Detect test files to run
const linterTestTargets = detectTestTargets(dirname, namedTestPrefixes);
After applying these changes, re-run the tests to ensure that the issues are resolved. |
|
The It seems like the version Resolution Plan:
I am unable to modify the |
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
Here's the code to remove the tests that use --- a/tests/index.ts
+++ b/tests/index.ts
@@ -689,9 +689,6 @@
postCheck?: TestCallback;
manualVersionReplacer?: (version: string) => string;
}) => {
- if (linterName.startsWith("pretty")) {
- throw new Error("`linterCheckTest` is not supported for pretty linters");
- }
if (linterName.startsWith("bio")) {
throw new Error("`linterCheckTest` is not supported for bio linters");
}
I am unable to update the tests to use the correct testing method for prettier or verify the version of |
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
|
SummaryThe tests are failing due to snapshot mismatches and a failure to install the hermetic tool Root Cause Analysis
Resolution Plan
I am unable to automatically resolve the |
|
I am unable to retrieve the file diffs for the failing tests. To further investigate the snapshot failures, please provide the diffs for the following files: Is this helpful? Click the 👍/👎 buttons below to let us know! Icons by Icons8 |
tldr;The tests are failing because the PR removed YAML from the list of file types supported by prettier, but the tests still expect YAML formatting to work. You need to update the test snapshots to match the new behavior. Detailed AnalysisSummarySeveral tests related to the prettier linter are failing because they expect YAML files to be formatted by prettier, but the PR has removed YAML from the list of file types that prettier supports. Root Cause AnalysisIn your PR, you've removed lint:
definitions:
- name: prettier
files:
- typescript
- - yaml
- css
- postcss
- sassThis change means that prettier will no longer be used to format YAML files. However, the tests are still expecting prettier to format YAML files, which is causing the following test failures:
Resolution PlanYou have two options: Option 1: Revert the change and keep YAML supportIf you intended to keep YAML support in prettier, simply revert the change: lint:
definitions:
- name: prettier
files:
- typescript
- yaml # Add this back
- css
- postcss
- sassOption 2: Update the test snapshots to match the new behaviorIf you intentionally removed YAML support, you need to update the test snapshots to match the new behavior:
Additionally, I noticed you've added a check in if (linterName.startsWith("pretty")) {
throw new Error("`linterCheckTest` is not supported for pretty linters");
}This suggests that you're aware of the changes needed for prettier tests. Make sure to update any tests that might be using the old test structure. Additional NotesThe PR title "Fix tests" suggests that you're trying to fix flaky tests. The changes you've made (removing YAML support from prettier) will indeed change the test behavior, but you need to make sure the test expectations are updated to match. The failing tests are currently marked as "HEALTHY" in the test status, which suggests that these failures are new and related to your changes, not pre-existing flaky tests. |
tldr; The tests are failing because the PR removes YAML from the list of file types that Prettier handles, but the tests still expect Prettier to format YAML files. You should update the test snapshots to match the new behavior.Detailed Analysis and Resolution PlanSummaryMultiple tests related to Prettier and YAML formatting are failing because the PR removes YAML from the list of file types that Prettier handles in Root Cause AnalysisThe PR makes a specific change to remove YAML from the list of file types that Prettier handles: lint:
definitions:
- name: prettier
files:
- typescript
- - yaml
- css
- postcss
- sassThis is an intentional code change, but the tests haven't been updated to reflect this new behavior. The tests are still expecting Prettier to format YAML files and report issues with YAML formatting, but with the change, Prettier no longer processes YAML files. The failing tests include:
These tests are failing because they're comparing the current output against snapshots that were created when Prettier was still handling YAML files. Resolution Plan
The PR also adds a comment in The changes to |
Test Failure Analysistldr; The tests are failing because you removed 'yaml' from the prettier linter's supported file types, but the tests still expect YAML files to be formatted by prettier. You should either restore the 'yaml' file type in the prettier plugin or update the test snapshots to match the new behavior. Detailed AnalysisSummaryMultiple tests related to the prettier linter are failing with snapshot mismatches. The tests expect prettier to format YAML files, but the PR has removed YAML from the list of file types that prettier handles. Root Cause AnalysisIn your PR, you've modified files:
- typescript
- - yaml
- css
- postcss
- sassThis change causes the following tests to fail:
The test failures are consistent and reproducible, showing that the tests expect prettier to handle YAML files, but your change has removed that capability. Resolution PlanYou have two options to fix these failures: Option 1: Restore YAML support in prettier (recommended)
files:
- typescript
- yaml # Add this back
- css
- postcss
- sassOption 2: Update the test snapshotsIf removing YAML support from prettier was intentional, you'll need to update the test snapshots to match the new behavior:
PLUGINS_TEST_UPDATE_SNAPSHOTS=1 npm test
Note that if you choose Option 2, you should make sure that YAML formatting is handled by another linter to maintain the same functionality. |
|
tldr; The tests are failing because the PR removed 'yaml' from the prettier plugin's supported file types, which causes snapshot tests to fail. Update the test snapshots to match the new behavior or restore the yaml file type support. Detailed AnalysisSummaryMultiple tests related to the prettier linter/formatter are failing with snapshot mismatches. The tests were previously passing but started failing after the changes in this PR. Root Cause AnalysisAfter analyzing the PR changes and test failures, I've identified that the root cause is the removal of 'yaml' from the prettier plugin's supported file types in lint:
- name: prettier
files:
- typescript
- - yaml
- css
- postcss
- sassThis change causes the following test failures:
The test history shows that these tests were passing before April 11th, 2025, and started failing consistently after that, which aligns with when this PR was created. Resolution PlanYou have two options to fix these failing tests: Option 1: Restore YAML support in prettier pluginIf YAML formatting is still needed, restore the YAML file type in the prettier plugin configuration: lint:
- name: prettier
files:
- typescript
- yaml # Add this line back
- css
- postcss
- sassOption 2: Update the test snapshots to match the new behaviorIf removing YAML support was intentional, update the test snapshots to match the new behavior:
Additionally, the PR adds checks to prevent Additional NotesThe test failures are consistent and reproducible, not intermittent, which indicates this is an intentional change rather than a flaky test issue. The PR title "Fix tests" suggests that the goal was to address test-related issues, so updating the snapshots is likely the intended approach. |
No description provided.