tud-letter:0.1.0 #3091
tud-letter:0.1.0 #3091
Conversation
hugoledoux
temporarily deployed
to
Package Check
GitHub Actions
Inactive
typst-package-check
bot
changed the title
hugoledoux
temporarily deployed
to
Package Check
GitHub Actions
Inactive
hugoledoux
temporarily deployed
to
Package Check
GitHub Actions
Inactive
| @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ | |||
| [package] | |||
| entrypoint = "src/lib.typ" | |||
| name = "tud-letter" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If you want this to be an official package, a faculty member needs to send an email to hello@typst.app endorsing this package. Otherwise the name needs to be prefixed by some non-descriptive part, so that multiple packages can co-exist. See our naming rules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am actually a faculty member: https://www.tudelft.nl/staff/h.ledoux/ + https://3d.bk.tudelft.nl/hledoux but I don't think I have personally the authority to create an official template for my university... But then I don't think anyone at the central admin will do it either.
prefixing is surely simpler. Would "almost-tud-letter" be okay?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
almost-tud-letter would work. I'm also not quite sure who has the authority to create official templates, if you figure that out we can always publish a new version of this package under the official name :)
| compiler = "0.13.0" | ||
| authors = ["Hugo Ledoux <@hugoledoux>"] | ||
| repository = "https://github.com/hugoledoux/tudletter" | ||
| description = "A Typst template that (almost?) replicates the TUDelft letter" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The word typst is somewhat redundant here and should be omitted. See: https://github.com/typst/packages/blob/main/docs/manifest.md#writing-a-good-description
| ## Example | ||
|
|
||
| ```typst | ||
| #import "../src/lib.typ": * |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The example should use a package specification
| #import "../src/lib.typ": * | |
| #import "@preview/tud-letter:0.1.0": * |
I am submitting
A Typst template that (more or less) replicates the TUDelft letter, which is only available in Word...
I have read and followed the submission guidelines and, in particular, I
selected a name that isn't the most obvious or canonical name for what the package does
added a
typst.tomlfile with all required keysadded a
README.mdwith documentation for my packagehave chosen a license and added a
LICENSEfile or linked one in myREADME.mdtested my package locally on my system and it worked
[X ]
excluded PDFs or README images, if any, but not the LICENSEensured that my package is licensed such that users can use and distribute the contents of its template directory without restriction, after modifying them through normal use.