Joss paper 2 #784
Merged
Joss paper 2 #784
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was prepared using Google Docs to solicit feedback from authors, then migrated to the joss markdown format.
…tex file. Used mendeley and the web importer to convert existing refs page to bibtex. There were two entries that had to be done by hand (Jordan and Beringer). Then from Mendeley Reference Manager, export to bibtex format, save in the bibliography.bib file. There are problems with non-unique citation keys will address in future commits.
...and various other cleanup: sort fields, remove empties, etc. used web app: https://flamingtempura.github.io/bibtex-tidy/index.html
Choose to keep some of the old info but put it in collapse boxes.
change setting to allow numbered figs, update .bib file.
...rather than using the embedded image and raw directive pattern.
...seems like things have evolved such that we don't need these empty sections...
- snow and soil - vegetation - run stages
Also move some items on output prep/processing into the running docs page.
An extra comma snuck into the description field for a few outputs, breaking the outspec.py tool. This commit fixes the commas and adds an exception with a message for the outspec.py tool to make trouble shooting easier.
- update bibliography - add software design seciton from JOSS paper - add figure. This used to be an embedded drawing that was in T. Carman's account. Moved the drawing to the shared drive and changed to a figure rather than embed, so that figure with caption can be used.
Resolved conflicts to accept updates from upstream/master.
We haven't released v0.8.2 yet but will ASAP - JOSS paper should be for the latest release, which will be v0.8.2 shortly. Will merge in some last remaning changes from JOSS review process among other things.
…ing... ...the model apart from a particular scientific project. fix up statement of need.
… in a Zenodo archive.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This branch brings in the JOSS paper (source code and supporting assets) along with a variety of changes that were made in the course of the paper review. Review thread is here: openjournals/joss-reviews#7667 (comment)