-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
Shacl12 overview #438
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Shacl12 overview #438
Changes from 9 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7b16f73
shacl12-overview stub
nicholascar 5919bb1
title fix
nicholascar 62f30f9
Merge branch 'gh-pages' into shacl12-overview
nicholascar 972af85
minimal Introduction section
nicholascar d7e3ed2
What's New stub section; SHACL-SHACL stub section; section reordering
nicholascar 3db8720
Address grammar point
ajnelson-nist 3b249ba
resolving several of @ajnelson-nist 's comments
nicholascar b1982a5
#433: Update Security and Privacy considerations section in light of …
ajnelson-nist 9ae79d7
Use definition list
ajnelson-nist 1eca4a8
editorial
nicholascar File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What will this link be? I missed some of the nuance about whether we need to have "shacl12" somewhere in this path.
If we need to reflect SHACL 1.2 outside of the link and instead inlined in the graph-file, would
owl:versionIRI
be an option?Please feel free to split this comment out to its own Issue if that'll be a big discussion. I somewhat suspect it will be.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This info's location is actually already superseded with the Appendix called "SHACL-SHACL", not "Validator", but the question about the IRI remains.
There is a plan to harmonise all SHACL namespaces into one, after development slows down/ceases, but I'm not sure if SHACL-SHACL will live in there with the rest of SHACL's definitions. I think we will retain
/shacl-shacl
, since it's already there.I suggest we will make SHACL-SHACL all (the comprehensive 1.2 validator) be the default at
http://www.w3.org/ns/shacl-shacl
, that we create other IRIs for the part validators and that we point aversionIRI
, as you say, at the soon-to-be old validator from 1.0.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Understood on the superseding.
I think SHACL-SHACL should remain in its own namespace. It is an adopter of SHACL, making it distinct enough in purpose (to me, anyway) from the definitions of SHACL.
And, already having the namespace helps the decision.