add new DPoPTokenSerializer class for [de]serializing DPoPToken

[snarfed]

for #122

@guillp one note here: this duplicates the existing code in AuthorizationRequestSerializer for [de]serializing DPoPKey. would you want a new DPoPKeySerializer class for that? I wasn't sure if you'd care more about the code duplication or the serializer class sprawl. I'm ok either way.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.83333% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 99.94%. Comparing base (49f0739) to head (69e6107).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
requests_oauth2client/dpop.py	95.45%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##              main     #174      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   100.00%   99.94%   -0.06%     
===========================================
  Files           20       20              
  Lines         1974     1995      +21     
===========================================
+ Hits          1974     1994      +20     
- Misses           0        1       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[snarfed]

@guillp friendly ping? I'd love to get back to using requests_oauth2client from upstream here instead of my fork!...but I need this PR first.

[guillp]

Hi @snarfed . This is not forgotten. But I didn't like to create 1 serializer class per token type. So I just started to refactor and improves all serializers in #196.